But he's stating some hard facts. This society is very artificial.
He did not mean polygamy, he meant the lack of monogamy, not the same thing
So basically, what he's saying is Somalia is a shithole because of polygamy?
Who is this guy?
![]()
SUGO SCIENCE
Monogamy is not the basis of civilization, and it proven by countless civilization built on polygamy and those some of which we have developed from.
Furthermore Somalia is shit hole mainly due to internal tension not related to sex but to power over the scarce resources in the face of lack technology to relieve the population of the harsh realities of Somalia.
Suugo SociologySUGO SCIENCE!
First, monogamy is not the basis of civilization, and it proven by countless civilization built on polygamy and those some of which we have developed from. It can be a contributing factor, but the civil-war in Somalia was not led by young leadership, but by older figures that disputed over the power-sharing and retribution in the light of it.
Secondly, Somalia is shit hole mainly due to internal tension not related to sex but to power over the scarce resources in the face of lack technology to relieve the population of the harsh realities of Somalia.
lmfao yeah the guy above was dismissing monogamy. And yes I disagree with the notion that the destruction of somalia could be reduced to such a simple idea such as enforced monogamy.SUGO SCIENCE!
First, monogamy is not the basis of civilization, and it proven by countless civilization built on polygamy and those some of which we have developed from. It can be a contributing factor, but the civil-war in Somalia was not led by young leadership, but by older figures that disputed over the power-sharing and retribution in the light of it.
Secondly, Somalia is shit hole mainly due to internal tension not related to sex but to power over the scarce resources in the face of lack technology to relieve the population of the harsh realities of Somalia.
Thirdly, the internal tension is exacerbated by foreign intervention in the ressources rich and former regional power which led to the civil-war and their is credible intel that internal combatanten enjoy financial support on the basis of such intervention.
In conclusion, I move to dismiss the above mentioned argument even as one of numerous factors.