Somalis basal eurasians

[Midas]

So I read an article about the end of the ice age and the rise of the naftufians and the neolthic revolution and how farming began in three diffrent areas of the middle east. Then I rembered that the iberomaurians share similar dna . So their shared dna is obviously more basal and are hunter gatherer groups correct . So is this third group that was somewhere in eastern sahar/sudan the ancestors of somalis paternally must of sepreated 20,000+ years ago ? But our maternal ncestors east african part of somalis was also in that area at the time? How close or far apart were they then actually? Is there anything I'm missing @The alchemist

 

[Midas]

@NidarNidar

 

[NidarNidar]

The Ethio-Somali component is closely related to the Maghrebi non-African genetic component, which diverged from all other Africans roughly 20-23,000 years ago somewhere in NEA, we're not Natufian but are closely related to them similar to how the split between us and nilotes (happened around 20,000 ago).

NA has had countless back migrations over the last 40,000 years, our origins point towards the Red Sea hills and were under the influence of Ancient Egypt material culture, the Beja who are cushites still live in the area practicing pastoralism.

The original Ethio-Somali-carrying populations arrived in the area before the pre-agricultural period from the Sinai, by men carrying E-M78(e-v32 Somalis) and the Red Sea region of the Horn of Africa through haplogroup E-V1515(Souther cushites)

When calculated the genetic distance (FST) between Ethiosemitic-speaking and Cushitic-speaking Ethiopians, and populations of the Levant, North Africa, and the Arabian Peninsula using two approaches: (1) the whole genome and (2) only the non-African component — in the whole-genome analysis, Ethiopian Semitic and Cushitic populations appear to be closest to the Yemeni; when only the non-African component is used, they are closer to the Egyptians and populations inhabiting the Levant.[24] However, this is due to the fact that the similarity is because of the Ethiopian contribution to the Yemeni gene pool. Pagani et al. (2012) states:

 

[Garaad Awal]

Neolithic Iranians have higher levels of Basal Eurasian (if it’s even real). Doubt Basal Eurasian has anything to do with Africa

 

[Midas]

The Ethio-Somali component is closely related to the Maghrebi non-African genetic component, which diverged from all other Africans roughly 20-23,000 years ago somewhere in NEA, we're not Natufian but are closely related to them similar to how the split between us and nilotes (happened around 20,000 ago).

NA has had countless back migrations over the last 40,000 years, our origins point towards the Red Sea hills and were under the influence of Ancient Egypt material culture, the Beja who are cushites still live in the area practicing pastoralism.

The original Ethio-Somali-carrying populations arrived in the area before the pre-agricultural period from the Sinai, by men carrying E-M78(e-v32 Somalis) and the Red Sea region of the Horn of Africa through haplogroup E-V1515(Souther cushites)

When calculated the genetic distance (FST) between Ethiosemitic-speaking and Cushitic-speaking Ethiopians, and populations of the Levant, North Africa, and the Arabian Peninsula using two approaches: (1) the whole genome and (2) only the non-African component — in the whole-genome analysis, Ethiopian Semitic and Cushitic populations appear to be closest to the Yemeni; when only the non-African component is used, they are closer to the Egyptians and populations inhabiting the Levant.[24] However, this is due to the fact that the similarity is because of the Ethiopian contribution to the Yemeni gene pool. Pagani et al. (2012) states:

So the paternal ethio-somali component came from the Levant through the Sinai? But didn't e-v32 and e-m3 come from eygpt/sudan area? So how does that work?

 

[Step a side]

Brother @Cognitive explains it well on this thread.


Post in thread 'Egyptians historians come in here'
https://www.somalispot.com/threads/egyptians-historians-come-in-here.154561/post-3777699

 

[Midas]

Brother @Cognitive explains it well on this thread.


Post in thread 'Egyptians historians come in here'
https://www.somalispot.com/threads/egyptians-historians-come-in-here.154561/post-3777699

Wow the guy really knows his stuff. But I'm still confused. How do the proto cushtic group somalis descend from have naftuain like ancestry since it seems like theri paternal haplogoruop e-v32 or the more ancestral one e-m78 are both from the sudan/eygpt area and are are around the same time or predate the naftufians. Did these haplogroups go to the middle east for a 2-3 thousand years and then come back?

 

[Step a side]

Wow the guy really knows his stuff. But I'm still confused. How do the proto cushtic group somalis descend from have naftuain like ancestry since it seems like theri paternal haplogoruop e-v32 or the more ancestral one e-m78 are both from the sudan/eygpt area and are are around the same time or predate the naftufians. Did these haplogroups go to the middle east for a 2-3 thousand years and then come back?

Those Anatolian hunter gatherers brought that Natufian like ancestry to Africa thousands of years before Natufians or Taforal even existed. Themale lineages of those Anatolian HG died out but their maternal lineages were kept alive by us.