As Somali Monarchist we demand that history is preserved and unchanged like the rest of the world and demand an automatic 'change' to the name of Somalia changing from 'republic' to a 'monarchy' since this is the truth now as it was then, a republic means the 'land is owned by all somalis' which is total bullshit and not observed anyway in Somalia.
Trying to copy the American system of republic which at least is not a republic in name but truly evident in the society that they are 'truly a republic' because all americans can rule which ever area of America since they disregarded all the history of the english and started a new chapter of creating an 'american' identity based on 'citizenship' alone giving all it's people equal rights and access to any part of that land. This is true it does actually work there however that is a far cry when u see Somalia where it's only a 'republic in name' but clearly 'monarchy' in culture and society.
All Somalis do not have the right to rule anywhere in Somalia be it village-town-cities. They do not have the right to 'graze' freely like we saw with the 'DDSI' smoking 'HG' nomads. A republic only leads to this belief 'that dhulka waa la wada lee yahay' when in-fact 'waa la kala lee yahay'. This must be presented in our constitution that this land wala kala lee yahay based on monarchy or else u will find more and more squatters justifying their squatting using this 'republican' nonsense and demonizing you for 'clannism' when in real fact it's not clannism that is responsible but 'preserving the monarchy powers'.
Somalis think clannism has no 'root in somalia' like 'cawaan', clannism is used to 'defend and preserve' The Isimo and it's authority, their 'holding' their land for their 'aristocrats' not just holding the land for 'clan purpose' that is unguided. I can't hold onto a land that doesn't report to an 'oday dhaqan' meaning an 'aristocrat' these are equivalent of land barrons of the UK in the past who were thus representing their 'monarchy' in the land. A republic will work against our long held traditions-cultures-and monarchy and if the constitution doesn't get updated to reflect this reality their will be continous clashes between the historical astriocracy vs the govt as they are two 'legit' govt one of the past and one that is trying to form a govt based on 'republic'.
Read Somali constitution very carefully and u will see it's saying HG can travel around the nation and settle, graze, and displace who-ever they so wish and have the legal system protecting him on the idea 'dhulka somali ba leh' since he is somali, the land isn't yours nor for the isimo or aristocracy, this will lead to a weakening of the aristocracy as we saw in the 'south' with the italians totally de-legitimazing their rule and has led to mogadishu where we are not 'guests' in mogadishu, we are republicans who are demanding mogadishu is all somalis kkkk however in our own lands we argue 'aristocracy' wax is qaadayso ma aha labadu. Kaagi wala wada lee yahay iyo kaygi ana leh waxay ka timada republicans iyo monarchist attitudes still circulating in society.
Somalia hasn't discussed this big 'elephant' in the room and I love touching on topics where it's not 'discussed 'since 'bakhti ayaa la qariya'. I always touch on areas to do with 'clan, aristocracy, monarchy, islam' have u noticed? these are 'elephants' in the room that can stir emotions. Somalis haven't even discussed the role of the aristocrats(isimo) and the govt and has a constitution that is not 'reflected' in the land, if it was all somalis would be able to settle, graze, and rule any land in somalia and since we do not see this on the ground, your form of govt is totally outside the norms of your people.
Trying to copy the American system of republic which at least is not a republic in name but truly evident in the society that they are 'truly a republic' because all americans can rule which ever area of America since they disregarded all the history of the english and started a new chapter of creating an 'american' identity based on 'citizenship' alone giving all it's people equal rights and access to any part of that land. This is true it does actually work there however that is a far cry when u see Somalia where it's only a 'republic in name' but clearly 'monarchy' in culture and society.
All Somalis do not have the right to rule anywhere in Somalia be it village-town-cities. They do not have the right to 'graze' freely like we saw with the 'DDSI' smoking 'HG' nomads. A republic only leads to this belief 'that dhulka waa la wada lee yahay' when in-fact 'waa la kala lee yahay'. This must be presented in our constitution that this land wala kala lee yahay based on monarchy or else u will find more and more squatters justifying their squatting using this 'republican' nonsense and demonizing you for 'clannism' when in real fact it's not clannism that is responsible but 'preserving the monarchy powers'.
Somalis think clannism has no 'root in somalia' like 'cawaan', clannism is used to 'defend and preserve' The Isimo and it's authority, their 'holding' their land for their 'aristocrats' not just holding the land for 'clan purpose' that is unguided. I can't hold onto a land that doesn't report to an 'oday dhaqan' meaning an 'aristocrat' these are equivalent of land barrons of the UK in the past who were thus representing their 'monarchy' in the land. A republic will work against our long held traditions-cultures-and monarchy and if the constitution doesn't get updated to reflect this reality their will be continous clashes between the historical astriocracy vs the govt as they are two 'legit' govt one of the past and one that is trying to form a govt based on 'republic'.
Read Somali constitution very carefully and u will see it's saying HG can travel around the nation and settle, graze, and displace who-ever they so wish and have the legal system protecting him on the idea 'dhulka somali ba leh' since he is somali, the land isn't yours nor for the isimo or aristocracy, this will lead to a weakening of the aristocracy as we saw in the 'south' with the italians totally de-legitimazing their rule and has led to mogadishu where we are not 'guests' in mogadishu, we are republicans who are demanding mogadishu is all somalis kkkk however in our own lands we argue 'aristocracy' wax is qaadayso ma aha labadu. Kaagi wala wada lee yahay iyo kaygi ana leh waxay ka timada republicans iyo monarchist attitudes still circulating in society.
Somalia hasn't discussed this big 'elephant' in the room and I love touching on topics where it's not 'discussed 'since 'bakhti ayaa la qariya'. I always touch on areas to do with 'clan, aristocracy, monarchy, islam' have u noticed? these are 'elephants' in the room that can stir emotions. Somalis haven't even discussed the role of the aristocrats(isimo) and the govt and has a constitution that is not 'reflected' in the land, if it was all somalis would be able to settle, graze, and rule any land in somalia and since we do not see this on the ground, your form of govt is totally outside the norms of your people.