I know the death penalty sounds effective but the results are not there. People are still committing murders, terrorism, why would they if this sentence was effective? The problem with the death penalty is, it's not a punishment to put people to SLEEP. Plus when your in a poor society, they may even LOOK forward to it(how terrorist brainwash them about jannah) due to their life on earth being so miserable.
I hope we have a serious discussion in Puntland about this. The death penalty is more effective tool as long as the person is rich or a politician that has done corruption as they have something to live for, it loses effectiveness when the person has nothing on earth and may actually be 'looking' for a way out and therefore doing crimes. The best punishment is to see the criminal/terrorist 'status' if he is just some poor person, we must put them on 'forced labor' camps, once the person is someone with status or wealth then the death penalty is effective.
Mark my words when the poor guy realizes he will be essentially a 'slave' on a forced labor camp for the rest of his life, he will never risk committing a crime because it will put him in a worse place then he already was, that's effective for them to make them go to even a worse place then poverty(slavery). Effective punishment must involve the person(losing something they value) and their life isn't valuable unfortunately due to their living conditions on earth.
But I do agree death penalty has effectiveness as long as the person is of high status in the community or has wealth, they will now lose all that. The punishment will mean they 'lose' and effective punishment has to have a 'loss' involved that is RELEVANT to that person. But taking the life of someone who doesn't even love their life on this earth will not be seen as a 'deterrent' for the poor criminal/terrorists.
I hope we have a serious discussion in Puntland about this. The death penalty is more effective tool as long as the person is rich or a politician that has done corruption as they have something to live for, it loses effectiveness when the person has nothing on earth and may actually be 'looking' for a way out and therefore doing crimes. The best punishment is to see the criminal/terrorist 'status' if he is just some poor person, we must put them on 'forced labor' camps, once the person is someone with status or wealth then the death penalty is effective.
Mark my words when the poor guy realizes he will be essentially a 'slave' on a forced labor camp for the rest of his life, he will never risk committing a crime because it will put him in a worse place then he already was, that's effective for them to make them go to even a worse place then poverty(slavery). Effective punishment must involve the person(losing something they value) and their life isn't valuable unfortunately due to their living conditions on earth.
But I do agree death penalty has effectiveness as long as the person is of high status in the community or has wealth, they will now lose all that. The punishment will mean they 'lose' and effective punishment has to have a 'loss' involved that is RELEVANT to that person. But taking the life of someone who doesn't even love their life on this earth will not be seen as a 'deterrent' for the poor criminal/terrorists.
Last edited: