Oh I thought you mean something else
Its really getting silly at this point.
Yasir Denied Yajuj and Majuj and called it a unrealistic that Allah Locked them away as well as Dajjal(Does not mean he is Dajjal he just Rejects stuff about Him), he also thinks some stuff in Islam is outdated and also sits with innovators.Its so funny Abu Taymiyyah face and why is the poor guy included in the list?
Also My Yasir Dajjal???? Caudubilaahi minal shaitani rajiim-- May God forgive them.
Abu Layman with a ponny tail HA HA HA HA HA HA
This the Deen Mate not something I own But Allah, People of Innovation need to be Marked they are Worse Fitna then Dajjal and Today the Ummah is Humiliated because we are not Upon Creed of he Salaf and early Generations who with it inherited the Earth and purified themselves.Its really getting silly at this point.
We need to seriously stop judging others. I guarantee you the biggest one needing your attention is the one that stares back at you when you look in a mirror.
I take my deen from the Somali Madrasa sheikh. Although be careful on your questions stumping them will lead to aggression.
What I doJust take the deen from your local mosque
How do you if your Local Mosque is upon the Sunnah and ways of the Salaf or Just some Sufi or Innovated Mosque?Just take the deen from your local mosque
Nothing to do with SPUB I have never even met or know any SPUB people nor am obsessed with them like you. They Are innovators and sit with innovators which is even worse - some are Sufis and also khawarij Sitters. One even sends recruits to Daesh whilst he sits in his couch. And Ayman is just a Layman who is also a sitter and does not believe theirs no leaders implementing Sharia he also exposes his sins and his dawah is not upon sunnah just story telling with 0 benefit.Basically everyone on the right side under "ahlus sunnah" are people associated with the SPUBS cult. "Ahlus sunnah" consists of Abu Khadeejah and his associates!
You must be under the SPUBS organization or you are "ahlul bid'ah". If you criticize SPUBS, you are "ahlul bid'ah". If you criticize Saudi Halloween, you are "ahlul bid'ah" (plus a khariji wishing the death of millions in violent revolt). If you disagree with a SPUBS cult follower, you are "ahlul bid'ah".
SPUBS cultism is a disease. If this disease spreads, the next thing is you'll be declaring like ninety+ percent of the ummah to be innovators. Everyone without approval of the SPUBS cult will be "ahlul bid'ah". And if they breathe the wrong way they will be labeled khawarij. You @techsamatar are a student of this SPUBS cult and since you came here you labeled like five or six of the forum posters including myself as khawarij.
Part of their ideology is the mass labeling of Muslims as khawarij and this ideology is behind the mass killing of Muslims in Libya.
You don't support the secular warlord Haftar? "You are a khariji".... and on this basis they committed the mass murder of Muslims in Libya.
This group also supported the mass murder of Muslims in Egypt after Sisi took over. You don't support Sisi, you prefer Morsi? "You are a khariji" and on this basis they committed mass killing of Muslims in Egypt.
Techsamatar has tried to downplay how serious the mass labeling of Muslims as khawarij is and pretend it is not a pretext for killing them (although he has openly wished death on me for criticizing the Saudi gov opening a movie theater).... go ask any Libyan from Tripoli. I met a guy from Tripoli and he told me about how Haftar claimed that the Muslims in Tripoli were khawarij and how this was used as a justification for attacking Tripoli and killing Muslims in Tripoli.
For the takfiris, they label pretty much all the Muslims as being kaffirs. For this sect which rightly or wrongly is known as "Madkhalis," pretty much all Muslims are innovators or "ahlul bid'ah". This is a very sinister cult that people should stay away from.
People are better off learning from scholars like Sheikh Uthaymeen or Sheikh Fawzan, not this hizb that tries to reduce ahlus sunnah to the rank of their cult and its associates.
Nothing to do with SPUB I have never even met or know any SPUB people nor am obsessed with them like you. They Are innovators and sit with innovators which is even worse - some are Sufis and also khawarij Sitters. One even sends recruits to Daesh whilst he sits in his couch. And Ayman is just a Layman who is also a sitter and does not believe theirs no leaders implementing Sharia he also exposes his sins and his dawah is not upon sunnah just story telling with 0 benefit.
Abu Dhar رضي الله عنه said,
“I was with the Prophet ﷺ one day and I heard him saying: – “There is something I fear for my Ummah more than the Dajjal.” It was then that I became afraid, so I said:- “Oh Rasul Allah!
Which thing is that?” He ﷺ said;
“Misguided and astray scholars.” [Musnad Ahmad (5/145) No. 21334 and 21335]
Your either from the left or right stop trying to make your own lane lol, and more are missing from right and they are also upon Salafiyahh. Anyone with that Madkhali bs is 99% on the left and hidden Khawarij Sitter hence they slander sheikh Madkhali who even the Scholars have praised.I don't listen to any of those people in that picture on the left or the right. It is a fact however, that pretty much every name that picture lists under "ahlus sunnah" is someone associated with SPUBS. None of whom btw are scholars. If people want to learn about Islam, they should learn from scholars. And definitely not from people like Abu Khadeejah or Shamsi. Or Faris Hammadi. (I know Faris and Shamsi aren't listed but they're prominent figures from that same group)
Your either from the left or right stop trying to make your own lane lol, and more are missing from right and they are also upon Salafiyahh. Anyone with that Madkhali bs is 99% on the left and hidden Khawarij Sitter hence they slander sheikh Madkhali who even the Scholars have praised.
Bro really said a cult called Madkhali Lol You try to blend in and try to play both sides to hide your upon the Manhaj of khariji.No I'm not. I like to learn from actual scholars like Sheikh Fawzan. Plus I read books. I'm not getting my religion from youtube. Not everyone is either going from Mufti Menk or Abu Khadeejah or AMJ.
You can falsely claim that anyone opposed to the ahlul starbucks minhaj or the "madkhalis" is therefore a khariji (and btw this just illustrates what I'm talking about- this thing you engage in of casually tossing around this "khariji" label left and right.... what actual scholar has affirmed this fake principle that criticizing the sect known as "madkhalis" is proof you're a khariji?) but that is just nonsense and a false principle without any basis.
"Anyone with that Madkhali bs is 99% on the left and hidden Khawarij Sitter hence they slander sheikh Madkhali who even the Scholars have praised."
Listen. "Anyone" is singular and "khawarij" is plural. This is like the fifth time I've caught you using that word in the plural form for a singular individual. You don't even know how to use that word correctly, much less are you qualified to go around and start declaring people khawarij and much less are you qualified to make up principles on who is a khariji and who isn't.
Shaikh Abdullāh al-Ahmarī said: I asked our Shaikh Ibn Bāz (rahimahullaah) over fourteen years ago, “O our Shaikh! Shaikh Rabī’ criticises so-and-so and so-and-so and he criticises the callers.” So Shaikh Ibn Bāz responded:“O Shaikh Rabī’, refute anyone who errs! Even if Ibn Bāz errs, refute him. If Ibn Ibrāhīm (rahimahullaah) errs refute him..”
On an occasion Shaikh Rabī’ delivered a lecture to the students of Shaikhul-Islām Ibn Bāz (rahimahullaah), entitled Holding Fast to the Salafi Manhaj. After the lecture, Shaikh Ibn Bāz himself delivered a short lecture beginning by saying [2]:“Fear Allāh! The man is an Imām in the Sunnah!” [1]
2. The Praise of the Noble Shaikh, al-‘Allāmah, al-Muhaddith, Muhammad Nāsir ad-Deen al-Albānī (rahimahullaah)“We have just heard this blessed and excellent lecture from the Noble Shaikh Rabī’ bin Hādī al-Madkhalī in the subject of holding fast to the Book and the Sunnah and warning from opposing them – and a warning from the causes of division, differing and fanaticism towards following of desires. So the Shaikh has done well, and has excelled in virtue and has benefitted [the people], so may Allāh reward him with good and multiply his reward.”
3. The Praise of the Noble Shaikh, al-‘Allāmah, al-Faqīh, Muhammad bin Sālih al-‘Uthaimīn (rahimahullaah)“In summary I say: The flag-bearer today in this era in the arena al-Jarh wat-Ta’dīl [3] in truth is our brother, Doctor Rabī’. And those who refute him, do not do so upon based upon knowledge, ever!..”
Then Shaikh Ibn ‘Uthaimīn was asked: “There is a question concerning the books of Shaikh Rabī’? (i.e what is your opinion concerning them?)” So the Shaikh (rahimahullaah) responded:“Indeed we praise Allāh, free is He from all imperfections, the Most High, that He makes it easy for our brother, the Doctor, Rabī’ bin Hādī al-Madkhalī to visit this region, [so that] the one to whom certain matters are not apparent may come to know that our brother, may Allāh grant us and him success, is upon Salafiyyah, the way of the Salaf. And I do not mean here that Salafiyyah is a hizb (partisan group) which is set up to oppose the Muslims outside of it, but I mean by Salafiyyah, that he (i.e. Shaikh Rabī’) is upon the path of the Salaf in his methodology. Especially in the field of actualising Tawheed (Monotheism) and throwing aside what opposes it. And all of us know that Tawheed is the basis for which Allāh sent the Messengers, upon them be peace and prayers. The visit of our brother, Shaikh Rabī’ bin Hādī to this region, our city, Unaizah, no doubt will have a good effect and it will also become clear to many of the people what used to be hidden from them due to the scare-mongering and rumour-mongering and also letting loose the tongues [of discord]. And how numerous are those who are remorseful about what they said concerning the scholars, when it becomes clear to them that they (the scholars) are upon the truth.”
4. The Praise of the Noble Shaikh, al-‘Allāmah, al-Muhaddith, Muqbil bin Hādī al-Wādi’ī (rahimahullaah)“It is apparently clear that this question is not in need of my answer. And just as Imām Ahmad (rahimahullaah) was asked about Ishāq bin Rāhawaih (died 238AH, rahimahullaah) and he replied, ‘Someone like me is asked about Ishāq?! Rather, Ishāq is to be asked about me.’ And I spoke at the beginning of my speech about that which I know about Shaikh Rabī’, may Allāh grant him success, and what I mentioned has never ceased to be what I hold about him in my soul, up until this time. And his arrival here and his words that have reached me, then no doubt, they are such that they will increase a person in his love for him and in his supplication for him.” [4]
He (rahimahullaah) also said:“I advise you to ask Shaikh Rabī’ bin Hādī, may Allāh preserve him. A great deal of his life has passed with [dealing with] al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn. He is the most knowledge person concerning them and their realities, and the true nature of the Jama’āt (misguided groups). I do not ask from you that you blindly follow Shaikh Rabī’, but that you should benefit from his knowledge. I do not say to you: Seek fatāwā from Mahmūd al-Haddād, nor from Farīd Mālik – rather seek fatāwā from a righteous man (i.e. Shaikh Rabī’), a scholar from the noble scholars – one who has made considerable inroads [in exposing] al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn.” [5]
When Shaikh Muqbil al-Wādi’ī (rahimahullaah) was asked regarding the speech of Shaikh Rabī’ al-Madkhalī against ahlul-Bid‘ah, he responded:“From the most insightful of people concerning the [misguided] groups and their taints in this era is the brother, Shaikh Rabī’ bin Hādī, may Allāh preserve him. Whomever he declares to be a hizbī, then it will be unveiled [and made clear] for you after some days that he is indeed a hizbī. So remember this..” [6]
5. The Praise of the Noble Shaikh, al-‘Allāmah, al-Muhaddith, al-Faqeeh, Ahmad bin Yahyah an-Najmī (rahimahullaah)“[Even] if I am disparaged by Rabī’, then take his speech!” [7]
“He is a Shaikh from ahlus-Sunnah, from those who propagate the Sunnah and wage war against innovations. He is man who is a carrier of the Sunnah, from those who defend the Sunnah and Tawhīd. Whoever hates him, indeed hates the Sunnah and whoever flees from him, flees from the Sunnah.” [8]
No I'm not. I like to learn from actual scholars like Sheikh Fawzan. Plus I read books. I'm not getting my religion from youtube. Not everyone is either going from Mufti Menk or Abu Khadeejah or AMJ.
You can falsely claim that anyone opposed to the ahlul starbucks minhaj or the "madkhalis" is therefore a khariji (and btw this just illustrates what I'm talking about- this thing you engage in of casually tossing around this "khariji" label left and right.... what actual scholar has affirmed this fake principle that criticizing the sect known as "madkhalis" is proof you're a khariji?) but that is just nonsense and a false principle without any basis.
"Anyone with that Madkhali bs is 99% on the left and hidden Khawarij Sitter hence they slander sheikh Madkhali who even the Scholars have praised."
Listen. "Anyone" is singular and "khawarij" is plural. This is like the fifth time I've caught you using that word in the plural form for a singular individual. You don't even know how to use that word correctly, much less are you qualified to go around and start declaring people khawarij and much less are you qualified to make up principles on who is a khariji and who isn't.