Leftist Privilege

[Periplus]

Protests at Kavanaugh's house 'nothing short of horrifying': Douglas Blair​

look at this- just since this thread started this has already happened. protests are one thing. scholars have come out against protests. I think Sheikh Uthaymeen suggested they might be permissible under certain circumstances. that's another topic.

but this- this I think does fall into terrorism. or at the very least is borderline terrorism. because this isn't about marching with signs in the downtown of a city. this is about gathering outside of someone's house with an implicit threat of violence against them to intimidate them. I think it's either terrorism or something very close to it. and there is this whole atmosphere of implicit- or even explicit- threat of violence against these judges. if the Republicans get to the point where they can be this brazen about threatening and intimidating people, it needs to be stopped. but right now it seems like it's the leftist extremists that are emboldened.

edit: btw I am not endorsing Fox or anything like that.... but.... the idea that having an angry mob gathering outside your house represents a form of intimidation... I'm not seeing anything to disagree with there

Ironically, the Supreme Court in Madsen v Womens health center allowed protests outside the homes of abortion centre workers.

But now, these same individuals are angry about protests outside their home regarding the same topic.

Im not here to defend abortion but your claims are wildly incorrect. These Supreme Court justices time and time again ruled that protesting is not harassment even when it’s outside peoples homes.

But we should feel sorry when their own rules are used against them??

 

[Omar del Sur]

Ironically, the Supreme Court in Madsen v Womens health center allowed protests outside the homes of abortion centre workers.

But now, these same individuals are angry about protests outside their home regarding the same topic.

Im not here to defend abortion but your claims are wildly incorrect. These Supreme Court justices time and time again ruled that protesting is not harassment even when it’s outside peoples homes.

But we should feel sorry when their own rules are used against them??

This is where "liberal Islam" leads you. One moment you're into this "liberal Islam" stuff, next you're making the case in defense of pro-abortion people.

"But we should feel sorry when their own rules are used against them??"

I don't believe in "liberal Islam". I believe in enjoining the good and forbidding the evil. I'm not neutral here. I'm against abortion like any Muslim should be (I guess it's different with "liberal Islam" people were it's as though you side with liberalism over the dīn) and I'm not in favor of the pro-abortion people.

Apparently, the court case you mention is from 1994. That is almost thirty years ago. I don't know the minute details of the supreme court. Aren't they a bunch of old people? How many of them on that court today were there in 1994? And out of how many total on the court?

Anyways.... yet again, you still don't refute what this thread is actually saying. You don't even try. You just illustrate that you'll go to bat for the pro-abortion side out of loyalty to an ideology that isn't Islam. It's a problem when you try to have two religions instead of one.

 

[Omar del Sur]

this whole issue of the supreme court ruling in 94... it really doesn't seem very relevant to me... but apparently only two out of the current nine supreme court justices were there in 94...

now a question I think is more relevant is- have there recently been protests outside the homes of pro-abortion people in the US?

 

[Basra]

View attachment 222609


can you imagine if Muslims acted like this? what if Republicans/conservatives acted like this?

I'm against the Republicans and I'm against this kind of behavior regardless of who does it but.... it makes angry- if you're a Muslim you can get stereotyped as a terrorist just because you have a beard and then meanwhile.... these antifa types can engage in actual, literal terrorism and the authorities sit back and allow it.

no one else is allowed to act like this- if you're a Muslim, you'll rightfully get dealt with, which I have no problem with and if you're a Republican they'll act like it's the new 9/11 (look at how they treat January 6)... but if you're with the Democrats you can engage in literal terrorism and the authorities allow it.

why should there be one set of rules for them and another set of rules for everyone else? of course it isn't that others should also be allowed to engage in this kind of violent behavior.... but the rule should be enforced for everyone... the rule should be that this kind of terrorism isn't permitted whether you are Muslim, Christian, atheist, Democrat, Republican, pro-abortion, anti-abortion, whatever. it is insane that they are given this much privilege that they can even go this far and it's allowed by the authorities. the moment this abortion news broke- twitter was full of open calls to terrorism and violence from the pro-abortion people. they are this bold because we all know that there is a double standard that protects them.

and another thing is why are Muslims painted as terrorists when these extreme leftists are actually openly calling for terrorism and they don't get painted in the same way? these things make me angry. it's wrong regardless of who does it but enforce the rule for everyone. no privileged class should be allowed to act like this.

Oh save us your whinnings. This is a liberal hemisphere. If u want conservatism, move to Russia!

 

[Omar del Sur]

Oh save us your whinnings. This is a liberal hemisphere. If u want conservatism, move to Russia!

View attachment 222812

I don't think you were born a woman. Your voice sounded male. I think that has to do with your defense of liberalism.

 

[Basra]

I don't think you were born a woman. Your voice sounded male. I think that has to do with your defense of liberalism.

 

[Periplus]

This is where "liberal Islam" leads you. One moment you're into this "liberal Islam" stuff, next you're making the case in defense of pro-abortion people.

"But we should feel sorry when their own rules are used against them??"

I don't believe in "liberal Islam". I believe in enjoining the good and forbidding the evil. I'm not neutral here. I'm against abortion like any Muslim should be (I guess it's different with "liberal Islam" people were it's as though you side with liberalism over the dīn) and I'm not in favor of the pro-abortion people.

Apparently, the court case you mention is from 1994. That is almost thirty years ago. I don't know the minute details of the supreme court. Aren't they a bunch of old people? How many of them on that court today were there in 1994? And out of how many total on the court?

Anyways.... yet again, you still don't refute what this thread is actually saying. You don't even try. You just illustrate that you'll go to bat for the pro-abortion side out of loyalty to an ideology that isn't Islam. It's a problem when you try to have two religions instead of one.

The only reason you wrote this post is to distract from the fact that I refuted all your points about “leftist privilege”.

You claimed that you wanted a genuine discussion but resort to name calling and false allegations.

I have not defended abortion, I’m calling out your argument about “leftist privilege”.

I even said clearly “I am not here to defend abortion”.

 

[Omar del Sur]

I even said clearly “I am not here to defend abortion”.

so then I guess "I'm not a racist but" proves that whatever you say next isn't racist.

"I'm not a defender of abortion but"...

 

[Omar del Sur]

The only reason you wrote this post is to distract from the fact that I refuted all your points about “leftist privilege”.

You claimed that you wanted a genuine discussion but resort to name calling and false allegations.

ahem. I already spelled out the victory condition for the campaign that you willingly took on behalf of the babykillers. you have yet to meet the victory condition and I don't think it's even possible for you to:


"so let me make explicit what is the victory condition for anyone who wants to disprove what I'm saying here: you need to show that there is no double standard and that leftist political violence is treated with the same standard as right-wing political violence. why were the truckers in Canada treated like terrorists but blm and antifa were permitted to burn down cities and engage in tons of violence yet not treated with nearly as heavy a hand? you need to account for that and the overall trend of the double standard- it isn't just one case we're talking about.

but really the claim here I think is irrefutable. everyone knows there's a double standard and that the state doesn't treat leftist terrorism the same way as that from other groups. you can see the blatant double standard in the truckers versus the blm/antifa riots. everyone knows the double standard is there and that's why the leftists who favor violence feel emboldened."

 

[Omar del Sur]

now that responding to the latest defense of liberal politics from Periplus is out of the way, let me move on to what I wanted to get to:



look at this. it said this is from 20 hours ago. facts are facts. the fact is this is BORING. please- tell these people to stop talking about Trump 24/7.

you look at Republicans, they are running on a very interesting and entertaining platform of "democrats are babykilling, child sex trafficking (pizzagate), transgender children grooming satanists slash degenerates and so on"..... they've even enlisted Alex Jones.

global warming people: "save the planet by going vegan and not having any kids"!
Alex Jones: "save the planet by fighting the ILLUMINATI!"

the Jones thing is way more interesting



look at Tucker Carlson: "it's a war on Christianity!" you remove Christianity and replace it with Islam and he sounds like a based Muslim preacher talking about kaffirs plotting against Islam. I clicked this msnbc thing and it turned out it was this homo student in Florida suing DeSantis.

the democrats at this point should just change their name to Hizbulatheism. they're basically just a political party of atheism and anti-religious agenda. how can Muslims rally around a platform of abortion and homoism? that's basically the center of their platform- abortion, lgbtlmnop and talking endlessly about Trump as though the man hasn't been out of office for two years. they're evil, they're literally satanic and then on top of all that they're boring. if they're going to be evil and satanic, you'd think they'd at least put in the effort to be interesting. it's just endless, "trump," "abortion" "gay rights," "jan 6" on a loop basically. and I guess Ukraine.