So, you do not subscribe to an absolute freedom, but free will with constraints and limitations; do you extend that to freedom of soul and mind?
We don't need anarchy freedom, yes technically that is the ultimate freedom but that's also a deadly and unproductive freedom and unworkable in social groups. There has to be LAWS. The question how do we divide up the laws where it impacts on a human being vs when it impacts on god and where do we draw the boundary/jurisdiction.
R u going to harm someone or disadvantage them if they did a sin only keyword ONLY effecting god but had no harm on any other human? humans i feel can judge humans solely on 'human affairs' but what is some man doing 'prosecuting and judge/jury/executioner for allah'? that is unacceptable u have to admit yourself. If a person makes dembi on allah, let allah handle his affairs in the here-after, why do humans on this earth need to interfere? it baffles me the stupidity.
My ultimate goal is a 'diverse' Puntland in terms of 'brain power' I want to encourage the exchange of ideas for them and have them go thru renaissance, that's my only goal, I have no other intention behind it. But for that to happen I know some major thing need to happen socially also where 'difference' is welcomed and protected, why would u want 10 million ppl like you and agreeing with u in round robin circuit lol, u can see nothing good will come from that but 'stagnation'.