How does your mind work? Let’s say two people have a girl and a boy. So the boy has an identity, but the girl doesn’t?*68IQ*
Of course we have an ethnic, tribal, racial identity. And just like men, we can and do date others.
The male response to that on here is to simultaneously denigrate and moan about it (but I thought she has no identity, so what’s the problem?), and to strip her of her identity at the same time. It’s cognitive dissonance. So does she have an identity, or doesn’t she? To their theory, don’t call me a Somali girl, just simply call me “girl”
Naa a woman doesn't even own her own child that she carried for nine months. She doesn't even own herself she takes male name expect her first nameDon't have a tribe/a race?
They can date whoever and they (sometimes) get in trouble for it.
Us, as intellectual, we know women can't have tribes and races.
Whar's your opinion?
Don't have a tribe/a race?
They can date whoever and they (sometimes) get in trouble for it.
Us, as intellectual, we know women can't have tribes and races.
Whar's your opinion?
How does your mind work? Let’s say two people have a girl and a boy. So the boy has an identity, but the girl doesn’t?
*68IQ*
Of course we have an ethnic, tribal, and racial identity. And just like men, we can and do date others.
The male response to that on here is to simultaneously denigrate and moan about it (but I thought she has no identity, so what’s the problem?), and to strip her of her identity at the same time. It’s cognitive dissonance. So does she have an identity, or doesn’t she? To their theory, don’t call me a Somali girl (not as if I’m missing out on much, let’s be honest), just simply call me “girl”
Women are not protectionist by nature. Biologically, they're geared towards survival mode and are more narcissistic than their male counterparts.
So terminologies such as 'loyalty', 'preservation', 'nation', 'country', 'race' are meaningless.
What of the women who ruled their people and kingdoms? They sure were qualified to lead in the eyes of their communities and were considered one of the locals. You think nations would entrust their security to someone they believe have no loyalty?
We all have mothers don't we? who taught us the clan and what is means to be a Somali.
There are multiple factors which can offset and manipulate someone's base nature. That's normal.
There can be a disparity between a person's primal innate instincts and current mode of behavior depending on those factors.
A man’s idea of maintaining lineage is to move the goalpost, arguing that whomever he pursues is of no consequence, bc he is the lineage, which is completely meaningless.It is not that complicated some women would buck the norms to follow their hearts. Men usually see themselves as responsible for maintaining the lineage and all that comes with it.
A man’s idea of maintaining lineage is to move the goalpost, arguing that whomever he pursues is of no consequence, bc he is the lineage, which is completely meaningless.
The truth is, they’re roughly the same. Men and women will go with the best they can get.
Women are not protectionist by nature. Biologically, they're geared towards survival mode and are more narcissistic than their male counterparts.
So terminologies such as 'loyalty', 'preservation', 'nation', 'country', 'race' are meaningless.
Its funny you say that as studies show that narcissism is more common in men.
Women also tend to be less individualistic and more empathetic than their male counterparts. If women didn't have these qualities then they would not be able to mother their children properly.
Narcissism is expandable. Women are more inward and care more for the well being of their nest as opposed to the nest hung up on the adjacent tree.
Men are more communal, societal, national etc.
u got it all opposite.
Women are communal and social
as men are the opposite but nationalistic as they like boarders for security and protection deal