I AM NOT A BIOLOGIST

[YAMS]

 

[Qeelbax]

Change title you’ll get better traction

 

[Mount23]

Absolute finished country, focused on too much nonsense

 

[Hodan from HR]

A biologist enters thread..

Uh oh

 

[Jaydaan]

Typical left wing nonsense

 

[__08]

View attachment 218115


View attachment 218116

We should have 5 genders & just leave it at that. Or just pick other if your’s isn’t there.

 

[YAMS]

Change title you’ll get better traction

If this is all you have to say to it, it doesn't deserve a better title!

 

[Lebron James]

Muh kweens

 

[Magan95]

I don’t blame her. She’s a politician and she would have been crucified by the dems for whatever she answered. She went the smart route and chose not to answer the question at all and say that it’s not her place to get sucked into this pointless direction.

Gender is a social construct so the term “Woman” depends on the societal parameters, in the west, it’s now acceptable for previous man identifying people to call themselves a woman.

Sex is biological, so Male and Female depends on what chromosomes you were born with.

 

[YAMS]

I don’t blame her. She’s a politician and she would have been crucified by the dems for whatever she answered. She went the smart route and chose not to answer the question at all and say that it’s not her place to get sucked into this pointless direction.

Gender is a social construct so the term “Woman” depends on the societal parameters, in the west, it’s now acceptable for previous man identifying people to call themselves a woman.

Sex is biological, so Male and Female depends on what chromosomes you were born with.

If gender is a social construct, why do we need a biologist to define a woman?

The problem here is her staunch adherence to politics. She is not avoiding politics at all, but instead she is disregarding all facts to regurgitate an ideological poison that appeals to a very small minority.

That is a terrible quality in a judge. In fact, it's the opposite of what a judge should be doing.

 

[Magan95]

If gender is a social construct, why do we need a biologist to define a woman?

The problem here is her staunch adherence to politics. She is not avoiding politics at all, but instead she is disregarding all facts to regurgitate an ideological poison that appeals to a very small minority.

That is a terrible quality in a judge. In fact, it's the opposite of what a judge should be doing.

She was basically saying that it’s not her place to answer this question.

They usually start with gender, then go into sex and get you trapped in the details. Then you’re labeled a trans phobe and the democratic party doesn’t support you anymore.

she knew that question would get her in trouble.

 

[mrlog]

She was basically saying that it’s not her place to answer this question.

They usually start with gender, then go into sex and get you trapped in the details. Then you’re labeled a trans phobe and the democratic party doesn’t support you anymore.

she knew that question would get her in trouble.

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[YAMS]

She was basically saying that it’s not her place to answer this question.

They usually start with gender, then go into sex and get you trapped in the details. Then you’re labeled a trans phobe and the democratic party doesn’t support you anymore.

she knew that question would get her in trouble.

I know what you're saying, but is she full of shit? I don't know-- I'm not a proctologist.

 

[Aurelian]

She was tricked to that question, which she get out of it swiftly, beside that doens't biology determinate who is a woman, so why they got mad?

 

[Aurelian]

This is who she should answered, I would pay anything to get back to that point and let her say: female is a featherless biped.