Hijab Burning protest in Iran

[Taij4an]

It was narrated that al-Bara’ (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: I heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “The Ansaar: no one loves them but a believer and no one hates them but a hypocrite. Whoever loves them, Allaah will love him, and whoever hates them, Allaah will hate him.”

Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 3672; Muslim, 75.

If a man who hates the Ansaar cannot be a believer and that makes him a hypocrite, then how about one who hates the Ansaar and Muhaajireen and those who followed them in truth, and slanders them, curses them and denounces them and those who love them as kaafirs – as the Raafidis do? Undoubtedly they deserve more to be regarded as kaafirs and hypocrites, and of not being believers.

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/45563/ruling-on-hating-the-sahaabah

and I mean... imagine... not only aligning with these people but supporting them in a war against the true Islam!

SHIA MILITIAS: Ethnic Cleansing of SUNNIS​

Iranian Sectarian Cleansing in Syria and Iraq.​

Also the fact shia follow a different sunnah to sunnis so they don't even follow and believe in proper Islam

 

[Qahwe]

I don’t even like Iran but this is probably some Western orchestrated shit.

Well is the “my hijab, my choice” protests in the west, is a western orchestrated shit? I thought that conspiracy theorists existed only in the illiterate 40+ demographic. I have stayed for sometime in a Muslim heavily populated area in the Netherlands, and women were wearing fully veiled clothing and were walking alongside cadaans in cadaan lands.

 

[World]

Firstly- how is Iran going to have a theocratic government without a religious population?

With or without the West, there is an inherent tension there. Everything I hear including from Iranians seems to indicate that the people there aren't even really very religious- but they basically have that government imposed on them without it having popular backing.

Secondly- I hope Iran's government collapses and it would be a good thing if it did. Iran would be a lot better off if they could focus on their own country instead of sponsoring terrorist groups. Iran is itself an imperialist power and they operate through backing Shia terrorism in Sunni countries. May Allah destroy their regime.

Iranian diaspora are not religious, they left Iran before or during the Islamic revolution. If Iran collapses, then the west will support an atheist/irreligious government taking over. If you believe that Shia Islam is worse than atheism and kufr then well that’s up to you.

 

[Omar del Sur]

Iranian diaspora are not religious, they left Iran before or during the Islamic revolution. If Iran collapses, then the west will support an atheist/irreligious government taking over. If you believe that Shia Islam is worse than atheism and kufr then well that’s up to you.

"Shia Islam"? Is there a Hindu Islam as well?

Imam Bukhari (Rahimullah) said: “I don’t see any difference between praying Salah behind a Jahmi or a (Shia) Rafidhi and a Christian or a Jew. They (Jahmis/Rafidhis) are not to be greeted, nor are they to be visited, nor are they to be married, nor is their testimony to be accepted, nor are their sacrifices to be eaten.” (Khalq Af’aalul-’Ibaad)

البخاري
قال رحمه الله : ( ما أبالي صليت خلف الجهمي والرافضي ، أم صليت خلف اليهود والنصارى ولا يسلم
عليهم ولا يعادون ولا يناكحون ولا يشهدون ولا تؤكل ذبائحهم ) . خلق أفعال العباد ص 125 .

no, I don't see ritually cursing the sahabaah and believing that it is a form of ibadah to kill Sunnis as being a form of Islam.

"well at least they're not atheist"- I don't see that as an argument at all for supporting them. by that logic, we should support the BJP and Christian Zionists as well since they also aren't atheists.

no, there's nothing in Islam that obligates us to support Shi'ism, Hinduism, Christianity or Judaism. the argument is very weak and has no scholarly backing.

and what do you mean by an atheist government? are they going to have a North Korea communist government that will outlaw religion?

no, the West would support some sort of liberal secular government.

anyways, you should come out with the real argument of the Iran supporters. the idea that they're going to turn atheist and we have to protect their shia religion so they don't become atheist... that's a weak argument but it's also not even the real logic behind the pro-Iran crowd....

the real argument that the pro-Iran crowd follows is that Iran is this ultimate enemy of the West.... and the conflict between Iran and the West is definitely not fake (which it is btw)... and so we have to support Iranian Shias in taking over the Middle East and we have to accept the eradication of Sunni Islam and genocide of Sunnis as a tragic but necessary sacrifice.... it is sad but we have to sacrifice our own religion to defend our religion.....

that is literally the logic of the pro-Iran crowd. oh and you're a CIA agent if you hold the same view of the Shia as Imam Bukhari and numerous classical Sunni scholars.

and as I said- we have no obligation to support Shi'ism- anymore than we're obligated to support ahlul cow-worship. but I'm not against Iran's government because I want a liberal secular government, I'm against it because I want an end to Iran supporting Shia terrorist groups. and chaos and civil war amongst Shia would mean a strengthening of Sunnis. all this is perfectly consistent with Islam. I want the defeat of people who are actively fighting Muslims, it's no different than wanting defeat for the crusaders in the Middle Ages.

 

[AMusee]