Nobody is justifying anything. Its a fact that if Mahdi and Aideed had come to a compromise in 91 or as late as 92’, the Americans and their Coalition wouldn’t have been in the country to begin with. Worst is that once they were in the country, these warlords thought it was a good idea to escalate a civil war into a war against a superpower. Then when the latter left, they went back to infighting and pushed the country to such a humiliating state that in the last 15 to 20 years alone hundreds of thousands of civilians either died from famine, terrorism or at the hands of African peacekeepers.
How is that any better?
At-least quote the New York Times article correctly:
View attachment 300764
None of your snippets point to a carefully directed ‘ethnic cleansing’ on the part of the Americans, more importantly all of the available reliable sources attribute the bulk of civilian deaths to infighting between factions as the numbers match the figures of the preceding years when there was no American / UN presence:
View attachment 300765
The fact that you hold someone like Aideed in high esteem by quoting him is madness considering the mayhem and destruction he brought to the capital and surrounding areas. The point I was making in my earlier post also seems to have gone above your head; the humiliation that followed the American / UN departure was 10 times worse, so how could you consider that a better outcome?
In the end its nothing like Gaza, the Palestinians didn’t have a viable state that they allowed to collapse at the hands of myopic warlords and then chimped out on each other, they were pushed to the brink of destruction by a foreign power like Israel.
Blaming America or the UN is just modern copium for the fact that early 1990s Somali warlords were the worst crop of Somali leaders to have ever existed. If America wanted to ethnic cleanse us, there wouldn’t be a Somalia today. Remember the 50 million strong Native Americans? Where are they now?
Exactly!