They have tested the autosomal ancestry of the individual from Somalia with that Austronesian maternal lineage and he clusters with Kenyan Swahili people. Likely a Bajuni and not an ethnic Somali.
So not too relevant for Somalis.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bajuni_people
Related ethnic groups (to the Bajuni):
the
Swahili,
Comorians
Here's the Wiki quote:
The Bajuni:...."The population's members trace their origins to diverse groups; primarily coastal Madow a descendant of slaves Bantus enslaved by somalis merchants. And they trace their origins to the
Khoisanoid hunter-gather groups, as well as later additions such as
Arab,
Persianand
Somalis immigrants.
[3] Some also have
Indonesian ancestry.
[5]"
The reference for this is:
Culture and Customs of Somalia
Mohamed Diriye Abdullahi,( 2001), page 11, who is misrepresented.
Here is Abdullahi:
The Bajuni .... "Their origins like those of the Benadiri are from diverse groups such as coastal Bantu, the hunter-gatherer groups of southern Somalia such as the Eyle, and later additions such as Arab, Persian, and Cushitic immigrants." ..... "Some authors have thought they have some resemblances to Indonesians because of their physical features. Instead of an outside factor, however, whatever Asiatic resemblances they may exhibit are probably due to the absorption of large numbers of the bushmanoid hunter-gatherers of the region than anything else."
As for the "coastal Bantu" he says on page 10:
"Before the invasion of the nomadic Somali and Oromo, their oral traditions told of a legendary kingdom known as Shungwaya that had control of the riverine areas and the adjacent coastal zones. In some areas, they are known by the name of Baarfuul (the palm people) as they are the only people that know how to plant and care for the palm trees in Somalia."
We know from Cassanelli that the first Bantu slaves brought by the Omanis arrived in the Bajuni islands after about 1800, long after the initial formation of the Bajuni people; and it is clear here that the coastal Bantu were part of the free Bantu expansion and not brought as slaves. That claim in the Wiki article is erroneous, not supported by the facts or the given references.
So much for Wiki! They can't even quote honestly.