TheWeekday
Garxaajis Slayer
Please read the attached .rtf file for an explanation of how to
interpret all the data and plots. All results can be misleading without interpretation.
The automated computer results are as follows.
Most likely fit is 92.7% (+- 1.2%) Africa (all East African)
and 1.5% (+- 0.1%) Oceania (all South Pacific)
and 5.8% (+- 1.1%) Mideast (various subcontinents)
and 0.0% (+- 0.0%) Europe (various subcontinents)
The following are possible population sets and their fractions,
most likely at the top
O-Ethiopia= 0.939 Papuan= 0.014 Bedouin_So= 0.047 Chuvash= 0.001 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.939 Papuan= 0.014 Bedouin_So= 0.048 Hungary= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.939 Papuan= 0.014 Bedouin_So= 0.047 Basque= 0.001 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.938 Melanesian= 0.016 Bedouin_So= 0.046 Hungary= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.916 Papuan= 0.014 Moroccan= 0.070 Spain= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.916 Melanesian= 0.016 Moroccan= 0.068 Chuvash= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.915 Papuan= 0.014 Mozabite= 0.072 Poland= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.915 Melanesian= 0.016 Mozabite= 0.069 Spain= 0.000
“O-Ethiopian” is Oromo which is
I did custom fits which resulted in
Papuan 0.0157 O-Ethiopian 0.8211 T-Ethiopian 0.1633 or
Papuan 0.0159 O-Ethiopian 0.8229 A-Ethiopian 0.1612 or
Moroccan 0.0691 Papuan 0.0159 O-Ethiopian 0.9151 or
Egyptian 0.0600 Papuan 0.0148 O-Ethiopian 0.9252
A-Ethiopian is Amhara and T- is Tigray. The Papual is very stubbornsly there. If you look at
some of thew scatter plots you are out of range on some of them, in a geographically eastern
direction. This means there is some small amount of something Indian Ocean. Perhaps
related to Madagascar or the Andaman Islands.
You are just slightly atypical Oromo.
Doug McDonald
interpret all the data and plots. All results can be misleading without interpretation.
The automated computer results are as follows.
Most likely fit is 92.7% (+- 1.2%) Africa (all East African)
and 1.5% (+- 0.1%) Oceania (all South Pacific)
and 5.8% (+- 1.1%) Mideast (various subcontinents)
and 0.0% (+- 0.0%) Europe (various subcontinents)
The following are possible population sets and their fractions,
most likely at the top
O-Ethiopia= 0.939 Papuan= 0.014 Bedouin_So= 0.047 Chuvash= 0.001 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.939 Papuan= 0.014 Bedouin_So= 0.048 Hungary= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.939 Papuan= 0.014 Bedouin_So= 0.047 Basque= 0.001 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.938 Melanesian= 0.016 Bedouin_So= 0.046 Hungary= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.916 Papuan= 0.014 Moroccan= 0.070 Spain= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.916 Melanesian= 0.016 Moroccan= 0.068 Chuvash= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.915 Papuan= 0.014 Mozabite= 0.072 Poland= 0.000 or
O-Ethiopia= 0.915 Melanesian= 0.016 Mozabite= 0.069 Spain= 0.000
“O-Ethiopian” is Oromo which is
I did custom fits which resulted in
Papuan 0.0157 O-Ethiopian 0.8211 T-Ethiopian 0.1633 or
Papuan 0.0159 O-Ethiopian 0.8229 A-Ethiopian 0.1612 or
Moroccan 0.0691 Papuan 0.0159 O-Ethiopian 0.9151 or
Egyptian 0.0600 Papuan 0.0148 O-Ethiopian 0.9252
A-Ethiopian is Amhara and T- is Tigray. The Papual is very stubbornsly there. If you look at
some of thew scatter plots you are out of range on some of them, in a geographically eastern
direction. This means there is some small amount of something Indian Ocean. Perhaps
related to Madagascar or the Andaman Islands.
You are just slightly atypical Oromo.
Doug McDonald