According to the Monumentum Adulitanum AS WELL AS the periplus, the Axumites were in control of barbaria AKA somalia
Its over bros they've won
Its over bros they've won
Proof?According to the Monumentum Adulitanum AS WELL AS the periplus, the Axumites were in control of barbaria AKA somalia
Its over bros they've won
The periplus states that east Africa INCLUDING the land of barbaria was subject to Zoskales King of Axum and the Monumebtum Adulitanum details the conquest of the incense land of barbaria which is SomaliaProof?
Show us where it says thatThe periplus states that east Africa INCLUDING the land of barbaria was subject to Zoskales King of Axum and the Monumebtum Adulitanum details the conquest of the incense land of barbaria which is Somalia
Hayye quruxleyShow us where it says that
Ye we get it palKing Zoskales is Eritrean from Adulis, Eritrea
it’s ntd broYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
It’s always been that way , even in the medieval and early modern periods. Ethiopia fielded massive armies but still faced defeats when going up against smaller, better-organized Somali forces
Take the Battle of Shimbre Kure: Ahmed Gurey led just 15,000 troops and routed an Ethiopian army reportedly over 200,000 strong. That wasn’t just about numbers , it was strategy, coordination, and superior mobility.
Same logic applies today. Numbers alone don’t win conflicts , capability, cohesion, and resources do. That’s why you see countries like China surpassing nations like India in most metrics despite similar population sizes. It’s quality over quantity every time.
So the focus shouldn’t be on inflating population size, but on improving the socio-economic metrics of Somalis , like education, income levels, healthcare, and infrastructure. A smaller, more productive population with strong human capital is far more valuable than large numbers with limited opportunity
This is filled with a lot assumptions and secondary aspersions. Because Axum is never mentioned in the inscription.
The Monumentum Adulitanum, was an ancient inscription depicting the military campaigns of an anonymous king. The original text was inscribed on a throne in Adulis. Although the inscription has never been discovered by archaeologists, it is known about through the copying of the inscription by Cosmas Indicopleustes, a 6th-century Greek traveler-monk. The text narrates the king's military campaigns in the African continent and in the Arabian peninsula.
If they traveled eastward, that would have brought them toward Southern Arabia.
The Rauso people were described as living between vast, waterless plains which corresponds to the Danakil Depression.
![]()
![]()
tAs for the 'Sesea' mentioned, they were most likely highlanders located around the Tigrayan/Tigrinya mountain regions. In fact, the conqueror’s reference to the conquest of the "Tigretes" is believed to be the earliest known mention of the Tigrayan/Tigrinya people.
![]()
![]()
Regarding the Solate, they are only mentioned once in the text. There's absolutely no solid connection between them and the Somali coast. In fact, none of the known ports or regions of ancient Somalia ,like Oponi, Mosyllon, or Avalites are mentioned anywhere in this inscription.
The tribes named here, like the Rauso and Solate, don't appear in any other historical records either.
![]()
Here is a map of the conquest illustrated, the ruler sets out from Adulis to eventually comes back to Adulis, after his African campaign he even subjugates the Sabaeans and Himyarites in Yemen,
![]()
This literally never happened at all except in your dreams. Stop acting delusional.According to the Monumentum Adulitanum AS WELL AS the periplus, the Axumites were in control of barbaria AKA somalia
Its over bros they've won
This contradicts Munro-Hay, Bowersock, LP Kirwan and other archeaologists tho who do identify it as possibly being Hadhramout but SOmalia is best as it was also known as barbarous and is likely the point of reference by consensusY’all must be seriously bored to keep operating troll accounts and spamming these repetitive derailment threads in retaliation.
It’s become predictable at this point every single time Somalia or the Somali region of Ethiopia is compared to Ethiopia, or when Ethiopia is criticized even mildly, threads like these pop up right after. It’s like clockwork. It's either this or retaliation for me describing development/industry gains.
Pretty sure what I said here triggered this:
Ethiopia's population in 2025 is about 135 million
People are overestimating, the population of the Somali region is nowhere near 25 million. I would estimate it to be closer to 12 million.www.somalispot.com
Here’s the context of what I actually said (before the selective outrage):
All I was doing was pointing out that obsession with population size , without reference to economic productivity or development outcomes , is a flawed and misleading metric.
As for the "Adulitum momentum" being framed as an Axumite conquest , that's just historically inaccurate.
It wasn't an Axumite state that pushed inland, but rather a campaign launched by an anonymous ruler based in Adulis, targeting Tigray, Danakil, and parts of southern Arabia. We've gone over this before.
Here’s a map that illustrates the actual campaign routes:
So yeah ,instead of nitpicking or spinning up threads full of irrelevant bait, try engaging with something substantive.
At least then the conversation might be worth reading. From where I’m standing, though, I’ll take the opportunity to drop something educational every time , so thanks for that, I guess.
This contradicts Munro-Hay, Bowersock, LP Kirwan and other archeaologists tho who do identify it as possibly being Hadhramout but SOmalia is best as it was also known as barbarous and is likely the point of reference by consensus