Arab Egyptian says islam is against humanity.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SuldaanGuled

Rag waa shaah dumarna waa sheeko.
Crime against humanity war beenta naga jooji

As if humans were one monolithic group that shared the same culture, religion , language. What he considers to be human rights are nothing but a subjective set of principles that other have defined according to their culture and views. If we ask ourselves who decides what human rights are and how they should be defined?

What him and others like him actually mean is how dare we not act according to commandments of the west. They judge islam based on their own self defined values and norms as if these were the standards that we should judge others by. We are the slaves of Allah and we live our lives according to what Allah commands.

What about those who keep entire nations in economic slavery ?? why is this not an important matter ?? if you truly were against injustice then you should be equally voicing your oppositions against anyone who engages in it , but are you really interested in this ? waa maya so stop projecting
 

Sharkman-Demon

Mossad Agent
How did Christianity come to Egypt? The answer is obvious. Christianity was forced upon the North Africans during the 2nd century.
You''l except that narrative because it's against Christianity but not the about the factual conquering and Islamization/Arabization by the sword with islam throught-out the Middle-East, Africa, Asia and Europe.
 

Sharkman-Demon

Mossad Agent
Crime against humanity war beenta naga jooji

As if humans were one monolithic group that shared the same culture, religion , language. What he considers to be human rights are nothing but a subjective set of principles that other have defined according to their culture and views. If we ask ourselves who decides what human rights are and how they should be defined?

What him and others like him actually mean is how dare we not act according to commandments of the west. They judge islam based on their own self defined values and norms as if these were the standards that we should judge others by. We are the slaves of Allah and we live our lives according to what Allah commands.

What about those who keep entire nations in economic slavery ?? why is this not an important matter ?? if you truly were against injustice then you should be equally voicing your oppositions against anyone who engages in it , but are you really interested in this ? waa maya so stop projecting

The truth triggered you on your disgusting evil religious cult aha. Nobody is a slave to a 7th century pagan arabian god unless they mentally choose to be. And humanity definitely shouldn't follow barbaric idiotic laws and degrees made up by savages under the guise of divine rulings and lifestyle.
 
Why wouldn't he have existed in Egypt if Mohammedan barbarians didn't invade and conquer Christian Egypt?


Arab didn't invade Egypt but Egyptian Christian clerics seeked help from Arab in Madina because they were under occupation of roman who abused them.
 
IMG_2150.jpg
 
Arab didn't invade Egypt but Egyptian Christian clerics seeked help from Arab in Madina because they were under occupation of roman who abused them.

In the history section, at least, these should have links.

There is an alternative explanation and history. Some of the Egyptians were Monophysites:

http://www.fsmitha.com/h3/islam08b.htm

"In the year 638 a general named Amr asked Umar for permission to invade Egypt – which was still nominally a part of Constantinople's empire. Amr described Egypt as rich and defenseless. Umar reluctantly approved, and in late 639 Amr made a swift raid into Egypt's Delta region to test the strength of Constantinople's defenses there. At the city of Heliopolis he routed Constantinople's forces. Then he overran open country. But without heavy siege weapons he was unable to take the city of Alexandria, and his army set up at a fortified camp six or seven miles northeast from Heliopolis, a spot that would eventually grow into the city of Cairo.

In Egypt, Constantinople's Catholic authorities had persecuted, flogged, tortured and executed Monophysite Christians, and the Monophysites saw the Arabs as liberators. So too did Egypt's peasants, who had felt oppressed by tyrannical, mostly Greek, landlords.

In 642 Alexandria finally fell to the forces under Amr, with Constantinople's troops and officials there fleeing Egypt, as did many merchants and landowners, who took with them what gold coins they could. Amr welcomed the return from hiding of Benjamin, the patriarch of the local Monophysite Christians, and he assured Benjamin that in the future his people would enjoy religious liberty.

Conquests were a source of wealth for the Arabs, and motivated by gain in wealth the Arabs invaded Armenia and Persia. They conquered Armenia in 642, making the people there subjects of Umar, but in name only as the Armenians, protected by their mountainous terrain, remained virtually self-governing and zealously Christian.

In 645, Constantinople tried to regain control over Egypt, transporting an army across the Mediterranean Sea. But Constantinople's army, weakened by several decades of warfare, was easily defeated, with the native Monophysite Christians fighting alongside the Muslims.

By 646 the Muslims conquered all of Egypt, turning Egypt into a colony. The Muslims mitigated friction between themselves and local people by putting local administration and tax collecting into local hands and leaving the Egyptians with control over their agricultural lands."
 

SuldaanGuled

Rag waa shaah dumarna waa sheeko.
The truth triggered you on your disgusting evil religious cult aha. Nobody is a slave to a 7th century pagan arabian god unless they mentally choose to be. And humanity definitely shouldn't follow barbaric idiotic laws and degrees made up by savages under the guise of divine rulings and lifestyle.

What truth ? didn't you get the memo from your asxabta ? truth is relative get on with it

It's an honor to be adoonka Alle ee orod adoon uu noqo augustus europanus

Do you actually believe for one second that you've brought forth any substantial claims worth considering ?? Those whom you espouse do far worse and force their will on others who don't share their views, yet you don't focus on them ?? why is that ??
 
@Grant coptic who seeks Arab to liberate them from roman. Look the Arab army were only 4000 only. I will bring more sources.



"The actual invasion began towards the end of 639, as Amr crossed the Sinai Peninsula with 3,500-4,000 men. He is reported to have celebrated the feast of pilgrimaga in Arish on 10th Dhul Hij A. H 18 or 12 December 640. After taking the small fortified towns of Pelusium (Arabic: Al-Farama) and beating back a Byzantine surprise attack near Bilbeis, Amr headed towards the Babylon Fortress (in the region of modern-day Coptic Cairo). After some skirmishes south of the area, Amr marched north towards Heliopolis, with 12,000 men reinforcements who had arrived on 6 June 640 reaching him from Syria, against the Byzantine forces in Egypt, under general Theodorus. The resulting Muslim victory at the Battle of Heliopolis brought about the fall of much of the country. The Heliopolis battle resolved fairly quickly, though the Babylon Fortress withstood a siege of several months, and the Byzantine capital of Alexandria, which had been the capital of Egypt for much of its 972-year existence, surrendered a few months after that. A peace treaty was signed in late 641, in the ruins of a palace in Memphis. Despite a brief re-conquest by Byzantine forces in 645, after the Muslim victory at the Battle of Nikiou the country remained firmly in Muslim Arab hands."
 
Christianity was tolerated in the Roman Empire until AD 284, when the Emperor Diocletian persecuted and put to death a great number of Christian Egyptians.[20] This event became a watershed in the history of Egyptian Christianity, marking the beginning of a distinct Egyptian or Coptic Church. It became known as the 'Era of Martyrs' and is commemorated in the Coptic calendar in which dating of the years began with the start of Diocletian's reign. When Egyptians were persecuted by Diocletian, many retreated to the desert to seek relief. The practice precipitated the rise of monasticism, for which the Egyptians, namely St. Antony, St. Bakhum, St. Shenouda and St. Amun, are credited as pioneers. By the end of the 4th century, it is estimated that the mass of the Egyptians had either embraced Christianity or were nominally Christian.[21]

In 451 A.D., following the Council of Chalcedon, the Church of Alexandria was divided into two branches. Those who accepted the terms of the Council became known as Chalcedonians or Melkites. Those who did not abide by the Council's terms were labeled non-Chalcedonians or Monophysites (and later Jacobites after Jacob Baradaeus). The non-Chalcedonians, however, rejected the term Monophysites as erroneous and insisted on being called Miaphysites. The majority of the Egyptiansbelonged to the Miaphysite branch, which led to their persecution by the Byzantines in Egypt, this continued until the Arab conquest of Egypt.

 
Christianity was tolerated in the Roman Empire until AD 284, when the Emperor Diocletian persecuted and put to death a great number of Christian Egyptians.[20] This event became a watershed in the history of Egyptian Christianity, marking the beginning of a distinct Egyptian or Coptic Church. It became known as the 'Era of Martyrs' and is commemorated in the Coptic calendar in which dating of the years began with the start of Diocletian's reign. When Egyptians were persecuted by Diocletian, many retreated to the desert to seek relief. The practice precipitated the rise of monasticism, for which the Egyptians, namely St. Antony, St. Bakhum, St. Shenouda and St. Amun, are credited as pioneers. By the end of the 4th century, it is estimated that the mass of the Egyptians had either embraced Christianity or were nominally Christian.[21]

In 451 A.D., following the Council of Chalcedon, the Church of Alexandria was divided into two branches. Those who accepted the terms of the Council became known as Chalcedonians or Melkites. Those who did not abide by the Council's terms were labeled non-Chalcedonians or Monophysites (and later Jacobites after Jacob Baradaeus). The non-Chalcedonians, however, rejected the term Monophysites as erroneous and insisted on being called Miaphysites. The majority of the Egyptiansbelonged to the Miaphysite branch, which led to their persecution by the Byzantines in Egypt, this continued until the Arab conquest of Egypt.

Nice quotes and a great further elucidation. Glad to see you caught yourself on the links. This is history and needs to be treated as such.
 

Axmed Xaji

Your non-biological father
What truth ? didn't you get the memo from your asxabta ? truth is relative get on with it

It's an honor to be adoonka Alle ee orod adoon uu noqo augustus europanus

Do you actually believe for one second that you've brought forth any substantial claims worth considering ?? Those whom you espouse do far worse and force their will on others who don't share their views, yet you don't focus on them ?? why is that ??
You're a slave to a 7th century warlord's plot to dominate the world. Atheists reject all forms of slavery.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Top