I don't know what this dna evidence is but he was talking from a morality pov not biological and trying to use it to say we should be ok incestHow do you reconcile that story with DNA evidence
![]()
I don't know what this dna evidence is but he was talking from a morality pov not biological and trying to use it to say we should be ok incestHow do you reconcile that story with DNA evidence
![]()
The version of incest for them was marrying their own twin hence they had to marry the other brother's twin. How does them being the only humans and needing to reproduce excuse incest today?
You've clearly been tickled in the ears by iblis himself if youre seriously asking this,Black
Incest is incest regardless of how you try to sugarcoat it. If Allah is all knowing, wouldn’t he know that incest will one day become something to be frowned upon, why didn’t he create other humans, so the children of Adam and Eve could marry them and populate the world? Your argument indicates that after he realised to have made an error, he corrected himself and thus banned the practice. You creationists believe our existence as human beings is solely due to that incestious act, then why complain of this family now? Give us good reasons other than the intention was to populate the world because you might also believe that allah was also capable to create husbands and wives for the children of Adam and Eve? Why did he resort to incestious breeding? What is good for the goose must be good for the gander. The Secular State should butt out of these consenting adult’s lives and allow them to marry just like the ancestors of creationists.
You've clearly been tickled in the ears by iblis himself if youre seriously asking this,use your head and think about what the difference in the situations is instead of trying hard to play devil's advocate/philosopher
I think cousin marriage should not be brought up with incest, scientists today now tell us that while 1st cousin marriage increases genetic defects, infact it doubles it when compared to non-cousin marriages, this is really only a 6% risk compared to 3% risk normally.Black
Morality? How about polygamy and cousin marriages?
A question to the people who believe in creationism to ponder. You believe that Adam & Eva (Hawa) were the first humans created by”god” and reproduced children. Based on your beliefs, their children practiced incest and married their own sisters to populate the world and later on, “god” decided that incest was terrible and banned it. What is this moral judgement now if you believe that humans today were the offsprings of incestious relations of Adam and Eve’s children sanctioned by your god?
I think cousin marriage should not be brought up with incest, scientists today now tell us that while 1st cousin marriage increases genetic defects, infact it doubles it when compared to non-cousin marriages, this is really only a 6% risk compared to 3% risk normally.
That 3% difference is the equivalent to the risk a 40yr old woman faces with bearing a child. We do not considering banning a 40yr old woman so this outdated ideology of cousin marriages being harmful from the mid 19th century needs to be corrected. Add to that if you consider 2nd cousin marriage then the risk is the same for genetic defects as non cousin marriages.
Laws of the time are different than laws of today, this is common knowledge Mr Gaal.
For each community comes new laws, ie Jews pray 3 times a day, while Muslims pray 5 times.