A daughter charged for marrying her Hooyo.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gibiin-Udug

Crowned Queen of Puntland. Supporter of PuntExit
Is only awkward if you make it one:bell:
Well you made it awkward. Who even asked your number.

I'm not a cheater,


I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater
 
Well you made it awkward. Who even asked your number.

I'm not a cheater,


I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater

I'm not a cheater
Talking=cheating?:childplease:
Nobody has a gun to your head you can ignore it or not:stevej:
 
Black

First, I don’t intend to have any children and if I change my mind, whatever they watch requires family discussion even if it’s a harmless cartoon show. I don’t like incest and neither would I encourage people to commit acts of incest, but as long as they are consenting adults, I want the State out of their lives. They are not harming society. The Secular State should butt out of consenting adults bedroom and should issue to them licenses of marriages.

Maybe because we are humans and not animals where does the line get drawn with you? Have you no moral compass?
 
Maybe because we are humans and not animals where does the line get drawn with you? Have you no moral compass?


Black

Morality? How about polygamy and cousin marriages? A 40 year old bloke marrying a child of 9? Raping slave girls? Let's not go there.

I don't endorse incest but when it comes the State Vs consenting human adults, the former should butt out. The Rights of the individual as long as it is not harming the general public should be upheld. I abhor religion, but I defend individuals to believe whatever religion they desire so, even when many Muslims call for my beheading because they consider me a "murtad". The civil liberty of the individual should be upheld and if consenting adults decide to marry, the State should full-fill their wishes.
 
Only cadaan folks.

tenor.gif

Then we immediately have at least one here strongly defending it. :vqbuyv0:
 

Dooyo

Inaba Caadi Maaha
VIP
But why are you guys even comparing homosexualality and incest?

Because LOVE is LOVE no matter what age, gender, class, qabil, race, religion or job type. If a daughter wants to bang her mom:vqbuyv0:, she should be allowed to.
 
A question to the people who believe in creationism to ponder. You believe that Adam & Eva (Hawa) were the first humans created by”god” and reproduced children. Based on your beliefs, their children practiced incest and married their own sisters to populate the world and later on, “god” decided that incest was terrible and banned it. What is this moral judgement now if you believe that humans today were the offsprings of incestious relations of Adam and Eve’s children sanctioned by your god?
 
Because LOVE is LOVE no matter what age, gender, class, qabil, race, religion or job type. If a daughter wants to bang her mom:vqbuyv0:, she should be allowed to.

But being gay isn't just love. It's something some people are and can't change. Just because they're both frowned upon doesn't mean they should be treated the same.
 
Black

Morality? How about polygamy and cousin marriages? A 40 year old bloke marrying a child of 9? Raping slave girls? Let's not go there.

I don't endorse incest but when it comes the State Vs consenting human adults, the former should butt out. The Rights of the individual as long as it is not harming the general public should be upheld. I abhor religion, but I defend individuals to believe whatever religion they desire so, even when many Muslims call for my beheading because they consider me a "murtad". The civil liberty of the individual should be upheld and if consenting adults decide to marry, the State should full-fill their wishes.
Why should the state fulfill their sick wishes? Cousin marriage/polygamy blah it looks like again right and wrong for you is based on whatever cadaan people think
 
A question to the people who believe in creationism to ponder. You believe that Adam & Eva (Hawa) were the first humans created by”god” and reproduced children. Based on your beliefs, their children practiced incest and married their own sisters to populate the world and later on, “god” decided that incest was terrible and banned it. What is this moral judgement now if you believe that humans today were the offsprings of incestious relations of Adam and Eve’s children sanctioned by your god?
The version of incest for them was marrying their own twin hence they had to marry the other brother's twin. How does them being the only humans and needing to reproduce excuse incest today?
 

Bahal

ʜᴀᴄᴋᴇᴅ ᴍᴇᴍʙᴇʀ
VIP
The version of incest for them was marrying their own twin hence they had to marry the other brother's twin. How does them being the only humans and needing to reproduce excuse incest today?

How do you reconcile that story with DNA evidence

:cosbyhmm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top