I’ll read it first.
Saudi getting severely karbashed by Houthi's
- Thread starter Factz
- Start date
Can’t find him. Could you send me a link?
did you guys know ?
that the majority of the population of najran is shiah muslim specifically of the ismaili sect similar to yemenis, and an area that has shifted between yemen and saudia arabia, in short they are basicly yemenis
so
if the houthis create a permenent stronghold in the region they will have thousands of local recruits and will be an even more dangerous force and could ignite a civil war or even the ouster of the saudis completly
You're wrong,
The houthis are Zaidi which the Shia consider as sunni and the Sunni consider Shias. They're the only Shias that haven't committed kufr as they don't hold Imams as intercedes like the others.
Zeila at once time in history was recorded to be full of them. Described by ibn battuta as blanks who spoke Arabic and performed Islam in Zaidi tradition (,0araphrasing)
Why would Allah curse a people upon tawheed and Sunnah? You are just blantly stating falsehood.
1.Saudi did sellout anyone
2.Think for myself?
3.When did anyone says it’s okay for The Zionists to opress Palestine? Bring your proof if you are truthful.
4.when did they merciilessly kill their brothers?
5.You have been on and on about Saudi this and Saudi that. Provide your evidence.
Which people are bringing you this falsehood? The western news?
«So it is a lie, a slander upon Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab that he rebelled against the Ottoman Empire, it is a lie because the Ottoman Empire had no rule there. The closest they were was in Iraq, and they were not in the Najd where Shaykh al-Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab was born. As for the shaykh himself, then his father was Shaikh Abdul Wahhaab bin Sulaymaan.
Part D:
So when the enemies of this Da’wah, they say that you are Wahhābī, in reality there are two mistakes that they are making:
- Firstly, that al-Wahhaab, it is a Name of Allaah (the Most High). So Shaikh Muhammad’s father’s name, meaning the father of the one that they hate, his name was ‘Abdul Wahhaab, meaning that he is the slave of The Bestower, because The Bestower is from the Names of Allaah. The name of the one who they want to attack, his name was Muhammad, the same name as the Prophet (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) and they accuse those who follow Shaykh al Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab, those who take his teachings or read his books, they say to these people ‘You are Wahhaabi!’, ‘they are the wahhaabiyyeen’ or ‘they are the wahhaabiyyah’ and this is reviling Allaah because al-Wahhaab is a name of Allaah.
- Secondly, that they are ascribing a people to his father and ignoring him because his name was Muhammad, his name was not Abdul-Wahhaab.
Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab also had a brother called Sulaymaan. Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab was born and raised in the village of al–‘Uyaynah in Najd, under the control of who? Under the control of the local tribe who used to fight other tribes for the control of local townships. Not under the control of the Ottoman Empire.»
Last edited:
@TekNiKo can you please provide direct statements from the scholar not someone unknown person on YouTube.
embarassing
VIP
@Libaaxseendheer is right, Shia is almost like another religion in some ways. And Iran wouldn’t be any better than the Saudi’s. Either way it’s the Saudis who have caused us the most problems.
@Lum is your religion Saudism? It’s literally the only thing you feel compelled to talk about, nothing else ever. Stop equating our deen with some corrupt family fear Allah.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is good country. Fear Allah? You guys have not provided valid reasons AS Why Saudi is corrupt. And May Allah(Subhanahu wa Ta’ala) continuento increase them in goodness.
Is it him? Name me a few scholars you take from.
https://www.google.com/search?q=alq...803j0j7&hl=nb&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Warya haye you won't change your views on this matter.
I wonder what all of the people that support the gulf arabs will say when their lord asks them why did you support the massacres against the yemeni people.
These Saudi bootyscratchers might have something to say now to try overcome the questions. But with the lord it is different.
«So we’ll begin with the era of the Shaykh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab. So I begin after seeking the aid of Allaah: The Turkish Ottoman Empire had pockets of sovereignty in the Arabian lands before the time of Shaykhul Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab – the Ottoman empire became little more than a hollow shell in Egypt, in Syria and in Iraq in the 18thCentury, and dates are important! 18th century meaning the Gregorian calendar, the Christian era. As for the Arabian Peninsula, then the ‘Uthmaaniyyah or the Ottomans never inhabited the vast areas of the Najd, the area where Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab was born and came from, and where his tribe came from, where his father came from and his grandfather came from – the Ottomans had never occupied that vast area. They controlled Baghdad and Basrah in Iraaq; but the closest they ever came to Najd, was in a place known as al-Ahsaa, in the year 1592 CE, which is a 1000 after the Hijra. They had a Turkish garrison at the village of al-Hufoof, however only 80 years later, meaning in the year close to 1100 AH, or 1600 CE, the Bedouin tribe of Banu Khaalid fell upon the Turks and expelled them, even from Hufoof. That’s the closest they ever came to Najd. The only place after that even recognised the rule in the Arabian Peninsula was the Hijaaz, Makkah and Medinah – and the Shareefs of Makkah looked to the Ottomans for protection. The Ottomans of course were based in Turkey with their rule centred in Istanbul and they had some control over the Hijaaz as protectorates.
Political power in the Najd, and the Najd is on the eastern side of Madinah, if you were to look at a map of Arabian Peninsula, Makkah and Madinah, Madinah in particular, you would find Najd on the eastern side. As for Najd itself and its political power, then at the time of Shaykhul-Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab and the time before him it was broken into small territories for centuries. The Turks had never ventured that far inland, they had never even ventured as far as Najd. Why? Because there was no benefit for them, it was open desert where the Bedouins lived and the Bedouins used to fight each other over rulership over minute towns and villages.»
Who did they mercilessly kill?
Why are you acting like Saudi came in and started fighting the Yemenis? They are fighting the Houthis. If you don’t understand then May Allah (Subhanahu wa Ta’ala) guide.
Last edited:
You're right, Zaidis in terms of fiqh are closer to Hanafis than they are to the Twelvers, but it's their aqeeda that's different from mainstream ahlus sunnah
We ask Allah to expose whoever is paying his salary. Because even the most rigid salafis would be embarassed to claim this guy
Salary? You must be joking.
Trending
-
Oromo nationalist got a hold of all the simping you niggas were doing- Started by Laiis
- Replies: 265
-
-
