Was I in the wrong?

Gooney112 said:

Loool you seem to have been hurt by that ogadeen boy really bad and now you bitter on guys. Hope you are over your depression inshallah

Click to expand...

That Ferrari guy just came up with some crap about me being married to an ogadeen guy, cause I said negative stuff about his adeer Madoobe.

Seriously though, personally I have never asked anyone how much they make. I consider it rude. If you like her apart from her asking about your salary, I think it is a trivial reason to end things with someone.

Block her she sounds like a complete

Gooney112 said:

He didnt say married. He said guy dumped you. He seemed to know you too well

Click to expand...

Oh so he changed the story to dumped now. Before he said we had a few kids and we got divorced( all bullshit).

Do you honestly believe some random guy on the internet knows about some guy who 'dumped' me.

You dont really believe in any of, it just fits your narrative.

Anyways I gave you good advice about your situation.

MariaMaria said:

Block her she sounds like a complete

Click to expand...

This guy doesn't have any other options if he blocks her.

Kkkkkk gooney she’s sending for you fam

Gooney112 said:

Wallahi im done with her. I have low tolerance for annoying girls tbh. Once she went on my nerves she blew her chance. Good luck finding someone like me I said to her

Click to expand...

Well it does not sound like you two are compatible.

Although there is noone on earth that is perfect, so remember that.

Knowles said:

Did you see any Somali odeeys when you were delivering these pizzas?

Click to expand...

Knowles

I saw a well known Somali Imam chatting with the Madam in the reception. He was laughing and seemed very happy. I was quickly ushered to the dining area, maybe he was there for research or tabliiq purposes as most influential men do in brothels.

AussieHustler said:

Knowles

I saw a well known Somali Imam chatting with the Madam in the reception. He was laughing and seemed very happy. I was quickly ushered to the dining area, maybe he was there for research or tabliiq purposes as most influential men do in brothels.

Click to expand...

I think he was there to do dawah

As Jesus Christ himself did so with prostitutes in his time.

Our Somali sheikhs are known for going above and beyond the call of duty.

Gooney112 said:

Mashallah it take bravery to preach and call allah to the lowestvin our society. To go in a brothel and preach and try to save lost souls is as noble as it gets

Click to expand...

Gooney

I admired him for using a legal premise that practiced safe sex, but would he preach safe-sex to his flock?

Gooney112 said:

Mashallah it take bravery to preach and call allah to the lowestvin our society. To go in a brothel and preach and try to save lost souls is as noble as it gets

Click to expand...

You’re right and I’m sure @AussieHustler can confirm that the whole thing ended with a happy ending.

Gooney112 said:

You are making a lot of assumptions. All you saw was him chatting to someone in the reception. How do you know he was buying sex?

Click to expand...

You’re kinda naive tbh. About trad as about an imam in a brothel lol.

Gooney112 said:

You are making a lot of assumptions. All you saw was him chatting to someone in the reception. How do you know he was buying sex?

Click to expand...

Gooney

The reception is inside a brothel and I bet he was there by himself (without the usual thawb, cimaamad and koofi) for cross-cultural education.

GoldmanSachs said:

Aren't you a uni student? Lol. I can't believe you're arguing against the fact that most genuine relationships require mutual physical attraction, and if there isn't any, then it is a business transaction and some form of prostitution. None of that is controversial at all to most people, and yet to you it is somehow scandalous. And the Harvey Weinstein example is not intellectual dishonesty, it is an astute example. No amount of money, power, or status is going to make that guy sexually appealing to most women.

Click to expand...

I am a uni student, and?

Did you really type the bold with a straight face?

In the first world, more recently as women entered the workforce in numbers, most no longer require a man for their survival. Instead, it’s the model of a couple coming together of similar economic ground, which leaves room for looks and other traits to balance the equation.

But even in this system, there are women and men who prefer the throwback model of mutual exploitation, beauty for riches and riches for beauty, and to consider it prostitution is intellectually dishonest, because all couplings are essentially on an exchange continuum, and that’s what they chose build their relationship on.

Now for a look towards the third world, there’s no debating this model is the dominant reality there, due to a wealth distribution even more egregiously in favor of men (though importantly, not most men), so women are traditionally much more likely to select for the highest earning man they possibly can for the comfort of their offspring and of their self.

So you’re saying if these women happen not to be genuinely attracted to their mates, it automatically means it’s a prostitution of self, and that it cannot and does not often lead to a fruitful relationship in your eyes, because of this lack of mutual attraction? So you’re saying that most of worlds relationships are prostitution and not genuine.

I honestly can’t believe I have to explain this to you.

Why is mutual attraction more genuine reality and mutual exploitation isn’t?

You’re clearly living in a bubble.

This is why I asked about your parents.

Gooney112 said:

@VixR

Im pretty sure he thought just like me you were talking about actual sugar daddy relationships rather than old school vs new school relationships. But you really need to stop with the absolutes when making points. It got me thinking....you probably study something that creates a lot of debating at Uni the way you make points. Everything is not black and white

Click to expand...

Gooney

The best thing you ever said on this board is, “Everything is not black and white”. Now, learn how to practice it and apply it to yourself.

Gooney112 said:

@VixR

Im pretty sure he thought just like me you were talking about actual sugar daddy relationships rather than old school vs new school relationships. But you really need to stop with the absolutes when making points. It got me thinking....you probably study something that creates a lot of debating at Uni the way you make points. Everything is not black and white

Click to expand...

That’s my whole point all along. It isn’t black and white. Relationship can be modeled on anything the two parties chose as a metric, and love relationships are a recent luxury.

You can’t have it both ways. If you want a throwback traditional modeled relationship, a big part of your appeal is what you can offer materially. And it’s an understandable metric to boot. You can try to turn around and complain about it, but you can’t be taken seriously.