The story still isn't clear. They said they were hit with 'light weapons fire' off the coast of Yemen. Then they say it was carried out by a Saudi owned Apache; killing 31 out of the 100 refugees (AUN). How can Apache gunfire be described as 'light weapon fire'?
How can the death toll be this low when the Apache has 30 mm cannonballs that will rip a person in half? It would obliterate everyone on that boat to a mush.
Either the reporting and eye witnesses were wrong and it wasn't light weapons fire. Or those refugees were killed with a different weapon (and perhaps by different parties).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.